America’s Self-Inflicted Human Capital Crisis: How the Immigration Crackdown Is Shrinking the Workforce, Economy, and Future Growth.

Last year we wrote that reducing immigration as called for by Project 2025 and supported by the Trump Administration would weaken the economy by shrinking consumer demand and reducing tax revenue. At the time, it felt like a minority position.

The latest estimates about migration and labor supply from the U.S. Census Bureau are alarming. Net international migration has collapsed from 2.7 million people in 2024 to 1.3 million in 2025, a 54% plunge in a single year. The projection for 2026 is even more staggering: just 321,000 estimated to enter the United States. If this trajectory continues, the US could cross a line it has not crossed in more than half a century: net negative migration. For the first time in over 50 years, more people would leave America than come to it. This is draining the workforce, shrinking the tax base, and accelerating the loss of human capital on which our economy so depends.

If you are an employer struggling to fill roles today, buckle up - you’re seeing just the preview. The pipeline of workers is beginning to collapse. The competition for talent will become more brutal, more expensive, and more destabilizing with each passing year. (How many of you are busting your budgets to get talent?) Entire industries could find themselves fighting over a shrinking pool of workers while critical jobs go unfilled.

And if you are a retailer, or any business dependent on consumer demand, the threat is even larger. Today you may blame slowing sales on inflation, weak confidence, or unemployment. But those are cyclical problems. When there are fewer people, there are fewer workers, fewer households, fewer customers, and fewer dollars circulating through the economy. A shrinking population reduces demand and it hollows out the market itself. The customer base you are worried about losing is not simply spending less. It is disappearing because it’s not coming to this country and people who are here are planning on leaving it.

Paul Krugman's (Nobel prize-winner in economics) recent piece, "The End of Immigration," lays this out. The chart leading his article, drawn from Census Bureau estimates, shows the trajectory of people moving into and out of the U.S. The lines are converging fast. Immigration is plunging. Emigration is rising. The gap between them, which represents net migration, is collapsing toward zero and trending negative. (The "2026" figure in the Census data refers to an estimated year running from July 2025 to June 2026; the actual calendar year numbers will almost certainly be lower.)

This isn't a political post. This is a human capital post and the data makes it difficult to separate the two.

The Math Works Against Us 

The U.S. fertility rate stands at 1.6 children per woman, well below the 2.1 replacement rate needed to sustain population growth. Without immigration, the working-age population shrinks. Both the Congressional Budget Office and the Census Bureau project that natural population increase (births minus deaths) will turn negative around the mid-2030s. Deloitte's February 2026 analysis puts it plainly: without immigration, the U.S. population is expected to decline.

Immigration has been the demographic counterweight keeping the labor market functional. Remove it, and the math stops working.

The Social Security Administration's own sensitivity analysis is clear on this: higher immigration improves the program's financial health, while lower immigration worsens it. The 2025 Trustees Report projects trust fund depletion by 2034 with a 23% automatic benefit cut if Congress does nothing. Penn Wharton's Budget Model and The Bipartisan Policy Center estimate that permanent deportation policies would increase Social Security's 75-year deficit by between  0.25% - 0.78% of taxable payroll and accelerate trust fund depletion by between six to 12 months.

And here's a number that rarely makes it into the immigration debate: in 2022 alone, undocumented immigrants paid an estimated $25.7 billion in Social Security taxes, despite being ineligible for benefits. That's not a drain. That's a subsidy - a subsidy that supports close to 1.2 million people per year.

Krugman makes a related point - he addresses the claim that restricting immigration has led to a surge in native-born employment. As he explains, and as a chart below illustrates, this surge was a statistical artifact created by a quirk in how employment numbers were estimated. Once new census estimates were incorporated, the phantom bulge disappeared. His caption says it all: "This didn't happen." Restricting immigration is not putting more native-born Americans to work but rather stalling construction and service industries.

The Human Capital Lens

Krugman's analysis focuses on the macroeconomic picture. We want to zoom into the organizational one, because that's where HR leaders, CEOs, CFOs, and boards actually make decisions.

We use Stela Lupushor’s 4W Framework to analyze workforce dynamics: Work, Workplace, Workforce, and Worth. Applied to the current immigration picture, each dimension reveals something important.

Work. Fewer immigrants means less labor available for essential work, particularly in agriculture, construction, caregiving, hospitality, and logistics. These are sectors where automation/AI is either impractical or years away from scale. Employers are already struggling to fill roles that the domestic labor force largely avoids. The administration itself has acknowledged that the crackdown is hurting farmers and the food supply, construction and the housing market.

Workplace. Fear of detention and deportation creates psychological insecurity that extends beyond immigrant workers to their colleagues and communities. Krugman notes ICE operating near schools, looking for parents and sometimes children to arrest. A PRRI poll he cites shows that public support for these tactics is remarkably low, with sharply declining approval of the administration's handling of immigration even among Republicans. When enforcement operations create fear in the places where people live and work, the ripple effects hit engagement, absenteeism, and retention across entire organizations. Workplaces don't exist in a vacuum but rather in neighborhoods.

Workforce. The crackdown reduces the future labor pool at exactly the wrong moment. The U.S. already faces demographic pressure from aging and declining birth rates. Immigration has traditionally replenished the working-age population. Immigrants are disproportionately young and healthy, which is precisely what an aging economy needs. Brookings Institution research shows that declining immigration has already exerted a negative impact on population growth in most parts of the country, with the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies noting that 14 states would have experienced population loss without immigration between 2021 and 2025. Cutting that pipeline is a poor strategy.

Worth. From a human capital perspective, immigrants are contributors to economic value creation, not a cost center. Their labor drives enterprise performance - not just their physical strength, but also their intellectual capital. Their taxes support public systems that benefit everyone. Krugman frames this well: the federal government largely collects taxes from working-age adults to pay for defense and social programs that primarily serve the elderly. Immigration expands that tax base. Reducing it lowers both the economic value generated by workers and the return on societal investments in labor markets. Since this is measurable - we should be measuring it.

The damage does not stop at labor supply. The March 2026 SBA policy now bars lawful permanent residents and any business owned even partially by a non-citizen from accessing SBA-backed loans, including 7(a), 504, microloan, and surety bond programs. This means that entrepreneurs who are already here, already paying taxes, already employing people, and already contributing to economic value creation are now being denied access to the very capital designed to help small businesses grow. In fiscal year 2025 alone, 3,358 SBA-backed loans went to businesses owned in part by lawful permanent residents. Those firms represented only 4% of SBA loan approvals, but for those businesses the impact is existential: fewer startups, slower growth, fewer jobs created, and more businesses that never get off the ground. 

The Governance Gap

Here's what concerns us the most: immigration has become a material human capital risk, and most organizations are not treating it that way. According to the BLS, approximately 49% of immigrants are “white collar” workers - meaning the current immigration crack-down is a “brain drain” for the US - weakening our primary global competitive advantage. 

Through Solange Charas’ lens of the intersection between HR, Finance, and Governance, three things become clear.

Finance. Lower immigration changes the economics of the business model. When labor supply contracts, wage pressure rises, particularly in sectors already dependent on immigrant labor - which honestly, is all sectors from technology, agriculture, construction, hospitality, logistics, manufacturing, healthcare, and caregiving.  But the cost does not stop with wages. Overtime rises. Vacancy costs rise. Turnover and recruiting costs rise. Projects are delayed. 

The new SBA restrictions amplify those costs by constraining access to capital for a significant segment of small business owners. Small businesses account for 99.9% of all U.S. firms, and immigrant-owned businesses comprise roughly one-fifth of them. Many of these firms rely on SBA-backed lending because they lack access to conventional bank financing. Removing that funding source reduces business formation, delays hiring, weakens local economic activity, and shrinks the future pipeline of employers themselves. 

In other words, the policy does not simply reduce the number of workers. It reduces the number of businesses capable of employing them. Growth plans stall because organizations cannot staff them. The tax base shrinks, putting additional pressure on Social Security and Medicare at the same time that the population is aging. 

Slower labor-force growth reduces GDP, productivity, and ultimately corporate profitability. The Census Bureau's March 2026 county-level data shows that every state and 90% of U.S. counties experienced a decline in net international migration between 2024 and 2025. These are balance sheet issues, not political ones. For profit-seeking organizations, profit will become harder to create without the primary source of value-creation in our service economy - PEOPLE.

HR. The labor market consequences are immediate and visible inside organizations. Recruiting becomes harder, slower, and more expensive. The pipeline of younger workers narrows at the very moment that large numbers of older workers are retiring. That forces organizations into a more aggressive and costly war for talent. Existing employees absorb the strain: larger workloads, more burnout, higher absenteeism, and lower engagement. Retention becomes harder because the work environment becomes more fragile. 

Roughly one-third of immigrant workers are already in management and professional roles, more than 40% of the foreign-born labor force has at least a bachelor’s degree, and international students disproportionately populate graduate programs in STEM fields. The situation moves beyond the labor shortage - it is a brain-drain risk. 

The consequences are particularly severe for women. Women-owned businesses are already less likely to receive conventional financing and are disproportionately reliant on SBA-backed lending and microloan programs. Immigrant women and women with green cards face an even steeper disadvantage because they experience both gender-based and immigration-related barriers to capital.

Many immigrant women-owned firms are concentrated in caregiving, hospitality, childcare, retail, health services, and personal services. These are industries that are already experiencing acute labor shortages. The new SBA policy effectively cuts off many of these entrepreneurs from the financing needed to start or expand their businesses, reducing both economic opportunity for women and the availability of services that support other women’s workforce participation. 

When fewer women-owned childcare, eldercare, and service businesses survive or grow, more women are pushed out of the labor force to absorb those responsibilities themselves. 

The metrics we are beginning to incorporate in our evidence-based decision-making including Human Capital Return on Investment (HCROI) and a precursor to profit will erode at an accelerated rate since it’s through people that organizations create value for stakeholders/shareholders.

Governance. Immigration policy now belongs on the enterprise risk register alongside cybersecurity, supply chain disruption, and climate risk. Boards and executive teams need to understand where their organizations are exposed. Which business units depend heavily on immigrant labor? Which critical roles, geographies, and suppliers are most vulnerable? What happens to growth, productivity, and customer service if labor supply continues to contract? 

They also need to think about disclosures. Labor supply risk is increasingly material, and investors, regulators, and analysts are paying closer attention to human capital dependencies. 

Boards should also view restrictions on immigrant entrepreneurship as a material supplier and ecosystem risk. Many organizations depend on small, local, and women-owned businesses in their supply chains. Limiting access to SBA capital will disproportionately weaken those firms, reducing supplier diversity, increasing concentration risk, and making local economies less resilient.

Companies that have made commitments to women-owned and diverse suppliers may find those commitments harder to fulfill. Not because demand disappeared, but because public policy eliminated access to the financing needed for those businesses to survive. 

There are also reputational considerations. How a company responds to immigration enforcement in its communities says something about its values. Candidates, consumers, employees, and investors are watching. In an era in which human capital is increasingly recognized as a material asset, silence is governance choice, not neutrality.

Taken together, these are not separate HR, Finance, and Governance problems. They are the same problem viewed from three different angles. 

• Finance tells us that lower immigration weakens growth, shrinks the tax base, and erodes enterprise value. 

• HR shows us that the resulting labor shortages, burnout, and loss of both frontline workers and high-skill talent make organizations less productive and less innovative. 

• Governance makes clear that ignoring these trends is itself a failure of leadership and risk oversight. 

When people are the primary source of value creation in a service economy, a shrinking and increasingly constrained workforce is not just a social issue or a policy debate. It is a material business risk with consequences for profitability, competitiveness, and long-term survival. 

So What Do We Do?

If you're an HR leader/CHRO, a board member, or a CEO, the question isn't whether immigration policy affects your organization. It does. The question is whether you're incorporating that reality into your planning.

Some starting points:

Model the impact. What does a sustained reduction in immigration mean for your talent pipeline over 3, 5, and 10 years? If you don't know, find out.

Quantify the risk. Treat labor supply disruption with the same rigor you'd apply to a supply chain disruption. Because labor is a key input into your business model. When labor is a critical bottleneck, you have an accountability to understand that, plan for that, and lobby for a different governance model. 

Invest in workforce development. If the pipeline of younger workers is shrinking, the workers you have become more valuable. Act like it. Train them. Retain them. Develop them.

Speak up. Businesses have historically been among the most effective advocates for rational immigration policy. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Business Roundtable, and sector-specific associations all have roles to play. Silence is a position, and it's not a neutral one.

The Bigger Picture

We wrote Humanizing Human Capital: Invest in Your People for Optimal Business Returns because we believe that how organizations value and manage people determine outcomes at scale. Immigration policy is one of the clearest examples of this principle in action.

The SBA’s new lending restrictions reveal how quickly immigration policy can become a broader attack on human capital and entrepreneurship. The policy does not merely tell immigrants they are not welcome as workers. It tells lawful permanent residents and mixed-status families they are not welcome as business owners either. And because women, particularly immigrant women, already face greater barriers to capital, they will bear a disproportionate share of the damage. The result is fewer businesses, fewer jobs, less innovation, and fewer pathways to economic mobility. This is a strategy of contraction.

The data is straightforward. Immigration strengthens the economy, supports public finances, fills critical labor gaps, replenishes the tax base, and provides both the labor and the brainpower on which future growth depends. Curtailing it does not make the country safer, stronger, or more self-sufficient. It makes the country older, smaller, poorer, and less competitive.

And unlike many policy mistakes, this one compounds. Each year of lower immigration means fewer workers, fewer taxpayers, fewer entrepreneurs, fewer students, fewer consumers, fewer children, and fewer people to support an aging population. The labor shortages deepen. Social Security weakens. Entire industries begin to hollow out. Communities shrink. Schools close. Businesses cannot find the people they need to operate. It is an economic downward spiral.

By the time these consequences are visible everywhere, it will be too late to reverse them quickly. Demographic collapse unfolds slowly. And then everywhere, all at once.

That is not a political opinion. It is a countdown.

---

Stela Lupushor and Solange Charas are co-authors of Humanizing Human Capital. Stela’s organization is ReframeWork, and Solange’s is HCMoneyball. Stela is an immigrant and Solange is a first-generation American. We are the very people who wouldn’t be here if these policies were in place.